My brother Tom posited an interesting question earlier this week following actress Natasha Richardson’s unfortunate skiing accident in Canada; something to the effect of:
If the health care system in Canada is superior to that of the US, why was Richardson flown to a hospital in New York?
My initial thought was, “well, to die of course”. However, a Canadian doctor’s contention that Quebec’s lack of a medial helicopter may have played a factor in Richardson’s death puts this question into a whole new context. “Our system isn’t set up for traumas and doesn’t match what’s available in other Canadian cities, let alone the states,” said Tarek Razek, director of trauma services for the McGill University Health Centre, which represents six of Montreal’s hospitals.
Food for thought…
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Interesting that one of the assurances I've heard regarding those who can afford their own health care today is "don't worry, you'll still be able to buy health care above and beyond what the nationalized system provides." Too bad Richardson and Neeson didn't/don't have such means to have taken advantage of that caveat in the Canadian system.
Post a Comment